You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] 26556476? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Nope, if they wanted to conceal rogue code they would trigger an overwrite of the biden subroutine, and then overflow that with stack data.

The whole concept of running voting software on a windows PC is flawed, the vote needs to be done by sealed hardware supplied by a security org, and then multiple independent counters both record what was output. Then post election, the hardware is independently audited.

Relying on ONE software company is not how mission critical industrial control systems are built.

Banking already uses sealed encryption hardware

[–] 26556968? ago  (edited ago)

then overflow that with stack data

Please don't throw around terms you don't actually understand. It would make no sense to do that and it would be counter to their goals.

[–] 26557191? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

honestly, go fuck yourself, I was writing code on the Z80 before your Dad was a sperm

if you don't know how to overwrite malicious code on purpose, by using code from legit subroutines to overwrite the space it's sitting in, then it's YOU that doesn't know what they are talking about