When you write code, you have to compile it. Here is an easily readable if statement in C:
If ( trump_count > biden_count)
{
trump_count --;
biden_count++;
}
That says if trump has more than biden, then subtract 1 from Trump and add 1 to Biden.
That is an oversimplified example but there would have to be something along those lines in the Smartmatic/Dominion code. So we should be able to get that off of the machines right? Wrong. Machines don't read code like that. That kind of code is compiled so that when it gets on the machine it is all just 1's and 0's and the program called the compiler creates that code and it is generally unreadable.
https://files.catbox.moe/ahpcx1.png
If we knew what the compiler they used was then we could decompile the code and have our smoking gun right there in the code. However, I think they thought that through and created their own compiler so that if the code and compiler are subpoenad, they can hand over a compiler that was designed in a way to obfuscate the offending code.
If you think writing your own compiler is hard, guess again. You just need to know how the CPU works and how storage and memory are addressed. Even that crazy bastard that wrote TempleOS wrote his own compiler.
I cannot believe we aren't dissecting the code forensically, and if someone is, that would be the absolute best way to prove this, beyond statistical analysis, eyewitness testimony, etc.
Happy Thanksgiving.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 26555421? 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Yes, determining that the machines were programmed for a specific outcome will take time though.
We don't have that much time. Like Rudy said, it could take 6 mo to a year or more to prove this in court.
The afidavids of eye witnesses and their testimony in court and data showing massive spikes of vote dumps in a few minutes, is I think enough to declare that election invalid.
[–] 26555919? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Precisely, and what the globalists are counting on is that these timescales are not what make population-level representative choices. They know that if Biden slides in while we wait for this proof, then by the time proof arrives, it will be old news. That's all it takes. Truth is not truth at the level of large groups. It gains a different character taken across hundreds of millions of people - truth is subordinated to the group mind, where stability predominates. People simply don't like to rethink things that they take to be old news. Think about it, the further back in time you have to reach to "edit" reality, the less stable your entire reality becomes - hence, the reason why old news is concrete news.
The democrats understand this psychology. It's also why they couldn't let headlines like the "Russia hoax" and things die in the news cycle. If they let that pause for too long, it would have become old news. For every thinking person, it did, but now we also have to account for desire. Desire plays a big part of interpreting our reality as well.
[–] 26555461? [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I think you're right. This is all so outrageous.
[–] 26559332? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Not if you used FISA and caught all the players playing....
[–] 26556849? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Once fraud is proven, POTUS wins. The beneficiary of the fraud should face repercussions, especially given that so many of those connected have obvious connections to the DNC/Biden candidacy.
Proving and showing how everything happens is how we get safe, secure elections moving forward.