You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] 26520523? [S] ago 

Yes, but not for political agendas and I have already explained to you how redefining words is a threat to our freedoms. In case you are still in the dark, think of it this way. If you can convince millions of the lie that an infinite number of genders is fact, then I ask you, what else can you convince ppl what is fact? How many other words are you going to twist so that you can push your nightmare agenda on the world?

[–] 26520696? ago 

You made a bizarre case against any word changing or adding definitions, but this has been happening since recorded history. Languages naturally evolve.

Seems like you have some stake against the word gender including identity. You have repeatedly gone against the dictionary, and favored emotional pleas invoking slavery, 1984, and a nightmare agenda. The word gender including identity is a fact, and facts don't care about your feelings.

[–] 26521282? [S] ago 

This is another thing that gets me about you leftists. You say things like bizarre in front of the argument of the opponent. In this particular case, this is nothing more than projecting. Sir I can assure you that the only thing bizarre is you believing they are an infinite number of genders.