You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] 26326372? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

From: doglegwarrior

what is threshold identification.. if he had said watermarks I might have had an overdose of hopium

[–] 26326564? 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I don't want to overdose you further but adding to the conversation. That could be exactly what he's referring to. Lets say in the past 3-4 days they've been actively scanning ballots using laser tech or some industrial machine that is widespread and continuous enough that they've had the chance to go through millions of ballots to check for the watermark. If what we've been told about the fake ballots (with no watermarks) is true, then it's entirely possible that they've uncovered millions of fake ballots, all of which are in favor of Biden.

Open and shut case. If the watermark theory is true, and the NG or professionals are actively scanning them, then the perpetrators are well and truly fucked.

[–] 26326861? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Would the NG be allowed to do that already? Wouldn't it need a lawsuit first?

[–] 26326634? ago 

Who is "they"?