You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] 25993604? ago  (edited ago)

What a bunch of dumb horseshit. So, I'm a moron for saying "hey guys we need actual evidence before we can run around saying we have actual evidence" and that makes me a "shill"? As if.

Fuck you and fuck your mother for having you.

I hope the evidence does exist and it comes out. But until then, there's absolutely nothing "controversial" or "shilly" in saying to be patient and get the goods before you say you have them.

It's not complicated. It's logical. And whatever mental gymnastics you're having to pull on yourself to believe otherwise is on you. I'm just calling it out. We have to be better than that.

This is an information war, isn't it? If so, then the only weapon that counts is truth. Without that, we don't have shit. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it no matter what other bullshit you wish to spew on your keyboard.

[–] 25994054? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

LOL. Regulars here--like myself--recognize your posts...continually the same elements. Syntax and "wall of text"....

Worst, you're so fucking NEEDY. You HAVE to claim superiority on every post. "Y'all this" and "you idiots" that....Tiresome, really.

[–] 25994306? ago  (edited ago)

That's nice. Why don't you refute my central point?

You can't. There is no evidence, at least not yet. You can dislike my writing all day. I give not a single fuck. You can attack the messenger, it does nothing to change the truth of the message.

Doesn't change the fact that it's stupid to say "we have the evidence" when the old man has given us nothing.

So why don't you argue against that?