You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] 25989537? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Vetting is required to say something is a true, proven fact, yes.

The fact that this is even a question you would ask proves my original point.

[–] 25998334? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

It was a who’s buried in Grant’s tomb question, don’t be thick. Lighten up Francis. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qdbfJeI1Y1I

[–] 25998753? ago  (edited ago)

I mean...you can market it whatever way tickles your balls best.

But at the end of the day, people who say "we have the evidence" when they have no evidence aren't helping the cause, they're hurting it.

I've held off on sending that Parrot story to any of my more skeptical contacts because I already know what the reply will be. "Yeah he said a bunch of shit but provided nothing."

And they would be correct. I realize that a good number of people around here are completely comfortable with saying "I have evidence" when they have literally no evidence, but it changes nothing in the arena of ideas.

And I'm just saying that if you care about actually waking people up, you have to give a fuck about such things. Because those sleeping people absolutely care about such things.

Again, shouldn't be a difficult concept to grasp nor should it be controversial.