You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
12

[–] 25393966? 1 point 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

Sciencefag here with experience dealing with hospital discharge data and death data. Just because 6% of the death cases had covid as the ONLY cause of death doesn’t mean that only 6% died from covid. You need to know what percentage had covid listed as the primary cause. They can list as many as five (I think, maybe more). The 103,504 is counting all where covid was listed, even if it was number five. What if it is number one with diabetes, heart disease, COPD also listed? What actually killed the person? They can’t use “old age” anymore.

I’m not defending CDC and I personally don’t even think covid exists. Just explaining how the data are gathered and collated.

0
11

[–] 25394213? 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

I was thinking the same thing, but still... we have seen from nurses that they are labeling covid patients as positive when their tests are negative, and we know doctors are putting covid as cause of death without even testing for it cause cdc revised their stuff so that could be allowed. So the numbers higher than reality.

0
4

[–] 25394320? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I agree. I went to the cdc link OP provided. It’s unclear whether or not their covid numbers are for “leading cause of death.” Meaning it was listed first on the death certificate. In their other data, they specifically state that the numbers are for the leading cause of death. So there is fuckery afoot for sure. But OP needs to walk it back that only 6% died from covid. That is simply not justified until we have more information.

0
0

[–] 25409727? ago 

Not to mention Medicare paying hospitals more for Covid patients. That says massive fraud right there!

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] 25400848? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Well I don’t think anyone really thinks that this means only 6% of people died of Covid.

That is, literally, what OP said in post.

0
2

[–] 25395666? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

What makes you think Covid doesn't exist? I've thought that, but they can't possibly pull off that big of a scam can they?

0
2

[–] 25400737? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Can’t they? Consider that everything you believe was taught to you by them. In particular, consider the entire germ theory is wrong. Consider that bacteria are our first line of defense against organic toxins (food breakdown by products and such). Consider that chemical toxins kill the helpful bacteria so the cell sends out exosomes to sponge up the chemicals and the body flushes them (lymph, mucus etc). The real culprit is chemical toxins, which they put in our food, water, air. Then they call bacteria and exosomes (viruses) the culprit and “cure” us with chemicals (vaccines, antibiotics etc.).

Then they laugh at us because we are so gullible. Imagine shutting down the world, making everyone stay inside or wear a mask over something that we cannot see. Not even with a microscope.
Check out Dr. Andrew Kaufman

https://www.weblyf.com/2020/04/dr-andrew-kaufman-and-the-exosomes-coronavirus-truth/

Check out Dr. Stephan Lanka

https://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/mcinterviewsl.htm

Finally, no one has died from coronavirus:

https://www.globalresearch.ca/no-one-has-died-coronavirus/5717668

0
0

[–] 25409740? ago 

Had Covid, it exists and is quite mean.

0
1

[–] 25394031? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

But if they didn’t list 5 and ONLY listed covid (6%), how can we assume anything else? Can’t we only assume that it’s the full 6% based on this data?? Asking for clarification....

0
9

[–] 25394155? 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

6% died of covid (or some flu they are calling covid) for sure, since it’s the only thing listed. But if, say 40% had covid listed first (leading cause of death), even though, say, two other things were listed as co-morbidity, then I think they would say those are valid covid deaths. But they aren’t giving that info (hmmm). If covid is listed second, third, fourth and so on, then it probably shouldn’t be included. (i.e. guy died from a heart attack but also tested positive for covid. Don’t even get me started on the testing.)

All I’m saying is that CDC has always recorded this way and it isn’t particularly nefarious. What is nefarious is not giving the percentage with covid as the leading cause. And MSM running around repeating the big number and fudging it and so on.