You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
-1

[–] 25257748? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Ever heard of Kevin Clinesmith?

Yup. First mentioned by Q more than two years ago. Zero evidence he was exposed by FBI insiders. In fact, evidence he was protected and is still being defended.

Or his guilty plea?

Yup. Plea to a ludicrous light charge suggesting DOJ is still favoring him.

Or his cooperation with investigators (Durham team).?

Nope. Zero evidence of that.

which is indicated on the admission of guilt paperwork?

Nope. Haven’t seen that. Because it isn’t there. I challenge you to quote the section you believe shows this.

Proof abounds...all you have to do is look.

Nope. Proof of FBI insiders outing DS within their ranks absolutely does not ‘abound’. I challenge you to show only an example or two. Clinesmith is not one.

Just an example or two. You don’t have to show proof ”abounds”.

0
0

[–] 25257997? ago  (edited ago)

Nope. Zero evidence of that.

https://pic8.co/sh/oWuUkB.jpeg

I wish you all were better at the job you were sent here to do. READ THE PLEA.

1
-1

[–] 25258143? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

I wish you all were better at the job you were sent here to do. READ THE PLEA.

Your wish has been granted. To wit:

A HINT in Clinesmith’s plea SUGGESTS he may be cooperating.

This falls far short of anything a reasonable person would consider proof.

Your claim that this qualifies as ‘proof’ only proves you are not qualified to engage in this discussion.