Posted by: 3983648?
Posting time: 4 months ago on
Last edit time: 4 months ago on
Archived on: 11/19/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 171
SCP: 27
28 upvotes, 1 downvotes (97% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 25257748? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
Yup. First mentioned by Q more than two years ago. Zero evidence he was exposed by FBI insiders. In fact, evidence he was protected and is still being defended.
Yup. Plea to a ludicrous light charge suggesting DOJ is still favoring him.
Nope. Zero evidence of that.
Nope. Haven’t seen that. Because it isn’t there. I challenge you to quote the section you believe shows this.
Nope. Proof of FBI insiders outing DS within their ranks absolutely does not ‘abound’. I challenge you to show only an example or two. Clinesmith is not one.
Just an example or two. You don’t have to show proof ”abounds”.
[–] 25257997? ago (edited ago)
I wish you all were better at the job you were sent here to do. READ THE PLEA.
[–] 25258143? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Your wish has been granted. To wit:
A HINT in Clinesmith’s plea SUGGESTS he may be cooperating.
This falls far short of anything a reasonable person would consider proof.
Your claim that this qualifies as ‘proof’ only proves you are not qualified to engage in this discussion.