You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
8

[–] 25257287? 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Internal FBI white hats are gutting DS operators from within the agency?

That’s great news. Have you seen any evidence to validate that claim? I haven’t, and I’ve been looking and hoping for that evidence for some time now.

Please share your evidence. I could use the boost.

0
1

[–] 25258066? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

https://pic8.co/sh/oWuUkB.jpeg

Evidence......share your evidence it’s not.

PRO TIP: you can’t.

STILL VOTING TRUMP

1
-1

[–] 25258177? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Evidence......share your evidence it’s not. PRO TIP: you can’t.

Indeed. Debate 101: You can’t prove a negative.

Ask your debate team coach when school reopens.

0
0

[–] 25259651? ago 

0
0

[–] 25261054? ago 

Yup. From earlier today.

Anonymous anecdotal offerings without evidence are often very interesting, but always remain anonymous anecdotal offerings without evidence.

0
0

[–] 25257459? ago 

I was just thinking the same thing. Would love it if this were true, but wishful thinking doesn't work for anyone except the Demwit Party.

0
0

[–] 25258081? ago 

2
-2

[–] 25257468? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Yes. Ever heard of Kevin Clinesmith or his guilty plea? Or his cooperation with investigators (Durham team) which is indicated on the admission of guilt paperwork? Proof abounds...all you have to do is look.

1
0

[–] 25257572? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Clinesmith's paperwork doesn't indicate cooperation, in fact it suggests the opposite

1
-1

[–] 25257748? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Ever heard of Kevin Clinesmith?

Yup. First mentioned by Q more than two years ago. Zero evidence he was exposed by FBI insiders. In fact, evidence he was protected and is still being defended.

Or his guilty plea?

Yup. Plea to a ludicrous light charge suggesting DOJ is still favoring him.

Or his cooperation with investigators (Durham team).?

Nope. Zero evidence of that.

which is indicated on the admission of guilt paperwork?

Nope. Haven’t seen that. Because it isn’t there. I challenge you to quote the section you believe shows this.

Proof abounds...all you have to do is look.

Nope. Proof of FBI insiders outing DS within their ranks absolutely does not ‘abound’. I challenge you to show only an example or two. Clinesmith is not one.

Just an example or two. You don’t have to show proof ”abounds”.