You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
13

[–] 25039321? 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

We know it is vanishingly rare for a minor to die from Coronavirus. I suspect that they typically are asymptomatic also. Before it makes any sense to enforce vaccination, we should force them to prove the necessity first.

  1. Is there actual scientific research that minors commonly exhibit Coronavirus symptoms?
  2. Is there actual scientific research that shows that asymptomatic infected people transmit the virus to others in a school-like environment?
  3. Is there actual scientific research that shows that the virus spread to others students & teachers in Sweden (who didn't lock down?)

I think if we insist on science, we win this argument. Because there is already good research that shows that vaccinating our kids is not necessary.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/07/20/keeping-schools-open-had-no-impact-contagion-swedish-study-suggests/

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/no-known-case-of-teacher-catching-coronavirus-from-pupils-says-scientist-3zk5g2x6z

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/07/13/german-study-finds-no-evidence-coronavirus-spreads-schools/

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/07/20/opinion/listen-science-reopen-schools/

0
3

[–] 25040714? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

You suppose they legitimately care about science?

0
2

[–] 25040795? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I suppose that the school board does care about public opinion. They are elected positions. The school officials care about the opinions of the parents. There is pressure on them all the time from the public.

If the science is clearly on our side, it is possible to win. Making up fake churches and forging documents seems less effective.