You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
1

[–] 24708615? 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Q hasn't commented on [Wayfair] at all,

I agree. Speculations are NOT to confuse with evidences.


Presumption Of Innocence

This is your reminder that according to the Laws, all are considered innocent unless proven guilty

If you use a speculation to claim that someone is guilty, you risk to expose yourself to an expensive libel lawsuit. Why? Because in the future, a speculation could be FALSE & DEFAMATION. Read more.

Is someone trying to fool you into a defamation? Could the person targeted by defamation be in fact a lawful & real Patriot? Speculations are valuable to make theory. While at the same time, speculations and theories are NOT to confuse with evidences, facts, truths. The Laws, courts, juries decide if someone is guilty. Speculations and theories do NOT decide those.

Trump's Libel Lawsuit Against New York Time

This is an example of a successful filled defamation lawsuit. By Donald Trump against the New York Time's FAKE news at

https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/2017/web/hero_images/Draft_NYT_Complaint_(NY_State_Court).pdf or https://archive.md//2q1kf

News at https://nypost.com/2020/02/26/trump-campaign-sues-new-york-times-for-libel/ or at https://archive.md//8F9AD

Your Vote Matters

#BLEXIT#JEXODUS#LEXIT#WalkAway