NSFW Anon Archived I cannot find a SINGLE story anywhere asking why Judge Sullivan hasn't dismissed the Flynn case yet. The Left's lockdown on the media is absolute. (QRV)
submitted ago by 3894711?
Posted by: 3894711?
Posting time: 6 months ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 9/25/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 800
SCP: 313
315 upvotes, 2 downvotes (99% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
NSFW Anon Archived I cannot find a SINGLE story anywhere asking why Judge Sullivan hasn't dismissed the Flynn case yet. The Left's lockdown on the media is absolute. (QRV)
submitted ago by 3894711?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 24462376? 5 points -5 points 0 points (+0|-5) ago (edited ago)
Why would there be a story over something that is fiction?
Appeals court dismissed the case and Flynn is a free man now. The only one who disagrees appears to be you.
[–] 24462418? [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Don't be such a moron. Read a fucking story. They are all clear. The appeals court ordered Sullivan to dismiss the case. In 99.99% of the cases, this would mean it's a mere formality that the lower court would indeed comply with the appellate court and do the deed. But this is Sullivan. He has not finalized it. The case exists until Sullivan dismisses it.
You don't know what you're talking about. You're a layperson relying upon your misinterpretation of stories you've read of a topic you don't fully understand.
[–] 24462465? 3 points -3 points 0 points (+0|-3) ago (edited ago)
Resorting to name calling?
I've read the stories. The case is dismissed. Flynn AND his lawyer have already started talking about the case because it is over. If it wasn't over, they wouldn't have been on talk shows talking about the case.
There is no reporting over what Sullivan is going to do or can do or whatever because there is no story there. If Sullivan does anything new then it will be something new that will have no impact on the case the appeals court already dismissed.
You don't know what you are talking about. You're a layperson relying upon your misinterpretation of the events and you don't fully understand.
[–] 24464523? ago
Treason charges might be interesting. Violations of UCMJ cover civilians if they have National Security authorization. By all means read the fine print "before" and "after" each oath is signed in blood.