Posted by: 3846552?
Posting time: 7 months ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 8/29/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 104
SCP: 68
68 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 24046970? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Well, let's go through your post:
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/16/trump-no-i-didnt-tell-flynn-to-talk-about-sanctions-with-russia.html
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/michael-flynn-russia-sanctions-mike-pence-234899
So, it appears, that someone in the Orbit of Pence told him something like: Flynn talked about the political sensitive sanctions on Russia, he denied first and then could not remember.
Then Pence, crapping his pants for the fall out, goes high in the saddle to Trump.
Trump asked Flynn to resign and he respectfully did so.
When you listen to the Brennan Interview 2017 with Line of Fire and you compare it to Mueller not having diddly squat on Flynn, you'll understand he did not lie. To placate Flynn as an habitual lier is, based on the available information, a wrong thing to do.
Does Flynn know how to use sophistry: I guess.
But here is the thing: The moment the Trump admin started working, there was disagreement about Flynn. Not about that he supposedly was a lier, but his views were unacceptable with Pence and his orbit. It was a political move.
That is why you see Trump always having been on his side.
It shows how one dimensional you are thinking.
It turns out you to be not only without reason repeating lies, thus impugning a good man's name and character, you are behaving like a jackass.
In effect, you are projecting as a democrat drone while trying to assume a mantle of respectability.