You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] 24046970? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Well, let's go through your post:

Yes, the call was a perfect call. No one disputes that

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/16/trump-no-i-didnt-tell-flynn-to-talk-about-sanctions-with-russia.html

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/michael-flynn-russia-sanctions-mike-pence-234899

So, it appears, that someone in the Orbit of Pence told him something like: Flynn talked about the political sensitive sanctions on Russia, he denied first and then could not remember.

Then Pence, crapping his pants for the fall out, goes high in the saddle to Trump.

Trump asked Flynn to resign and he respectfully did so.

When you listen to the Brennan Interview 2017 with Line of Fire and you compare it to Mueller not having diddly squat on Flynn, you'll understand he did not lie. To placate Flynn as an habitual lier is, based on the available information, a wrong thing to do.

Does Flynn know how to use sophistry: I guess.

But here is the thing: The moment the Trump admin started working, there was disagreement about Flynn. Not about that he supposedly was a lier, but his views were unacceptable with Pence and his orbit. It was a political move.

That is why you see Trump always having been on his side.

It takes a total jackass to give the Deep State Slime that sort of reason to investigate.

It shows how one dimensional you are thinking.

It turns out you to be not only without reason repeating lies, thus impugning a good man's name and character, you are behaving like a jackass.

In effect, you are projecting as a democrat drone while trying to assume a mantle of respectability.

And thus I clothe my naked villany With odd old ends stol'n out of holy writ, And seem a saint, when most I play the devil.