Posted by: 3845915?
Posting time: 7 months ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 8/28/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 82
SCP: -25
2 upvotes, 27 downvotes (7% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 24041226? [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
No. Platform are protected by the government while censoring content they don't like: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230
[–] 24041260? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Exactly, good Samaritan protection for actions taken in good faith. Random banning people who violated no openly stated rule is clearly the act of a publisher curating content it disagrees with.
Twitter must stop acting in bad faith or it loses protections granted to platforms.
[–] 24041277? [S] 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
How do you know they act in bad faith? Is the government now deciding who acts in bad faith? There's no random banning on Twitter. Only banning of bad people.