Posted by: 3845915?
Posting time: 7 months ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 8/28/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 82
SCP: -25
2 upvotes, 27 downvotes (7% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 24040927? 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Actually they have a "monopoly" of sorts and raise antitrust questions. Also, the 230 question is are they "publishers? They act like publishers when they edit or post comments e.g. "fact checks" on OPs. So if they are publishers, then they are liable to lawsuits like any other publishers. Why should they get the special protections that section 230 of the law has provided them.
[–] 24041239? [S] ago (edited ago)
Platforms are protected to censor anything they don't think is good:
Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230
[–] 24043840? ago
Exactly what the President is overturning. Thanks for posting the current law language.