You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
-1

[–] 23981220? [S] 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago  (edited ago)

So give us a disease that is real, instead of the hoax Wuhan flu. Take, for instance, cancer.

Then give us a cure (even the same cure, HCQ again) that works on it (I'm not saying HCQ works on cancer, though that's the scuttlebutt around these parts).

Let the soft-headed lefties pull on that string until it unravels the whole yarn of shit. I'd be fine with that taking years and years, because then at least we'd be making progress. Instead of what we're doing now, which is lose ground for 4 years, in addition to all the other ground-losing we'd done over the last decades/centuries (ages?).

0
1

[–] 23981666? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I think if you all the sudden released cures that have been under lock and key to the public, the economic and social reaction would be unmanageable.

0
1

[–] 23981725? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

This is a variant of the "if we declassed, they would declare war on us" argument.

Who would riot at cancer being cured? Who would threaten us? How would it be unmanageable for cancer to be cured? Because presumably it's going to be cured eventually as Q declassifies that information.

Declas the cures, and Q+ the grand showman could even keep his precious slow roll. Lefties would demand further declas to understand how this could have happened. President Trump could trickle out the responsive document, which prompts more requests for declas, for years, just as Q has trickled out riddles that never come to pass for 3 years. It could still build up to a grand reveal, only we'd be slowly gaining ground for years, instead of slowly continuing to lose ground for years.

0
0

[–] 23981515? ago 

The studies I saw was that it boosted the effects of chemo in the range of 5-10%, not quite a cure, but a booster in that sense. For all I know it is part of standard chemo at this point, it was just pulled from one of the lists of all HCQ benefits.

0
0

[–] 23981653? [S] ago 

Then why are we pussy footing around the issue?

President Trump should issue a single page declas, in which he says the government has known for some time that HCQ plus this cures cancer.

With right to try legislation in place, people would try. Probably it would be conservatives who don't value their ideology over the life of a terminally ill family member. The evidence that it works would be undeniable.

By contrast, who has been cured of the wuhan flu? We can't even reliably test who has it to begin with? Why would we waste President Trump's credibility on the issue of hidden cures curing a fake disease?

1
0

[–] 23981505? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Why would any rational person want a ‘disease that is real’. Get the fuck out of here with this weak pilpul shit.

0
1

[–] 23981624? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You dumb fucking nigger. I was not saying "give me..." (as in, cause me to contract) "...a disease that is real."

I was saying "let us cure a real disease so we can verify the results, instead of curing a fake disease such that we'll never know if it actually worked and such that President Trump doesn't receive any credit for having cured a disease but instead gets a reputation as a guy who says random shit cures things".

pilpul

Since your argument consisted of an inappropriately literal interpretation of a truncated portion of my post, it is fitting that you simultaneously accused me of pilpul. I know (you) by your actions, at least.