You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
8

[–] 23794476? 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

This is a big deal. I'm going to track down some more info on why amicus briefs aren't allowed in criminal cases.

Sincerely, your friendly anon from the other thread.

0
8

[–] 23794636? [S] 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Cool. I think it boils down to hearsay. This is trial court, not appellate. Even at appellate, Ginsberg said the parties are primary. Here, the parties have washed their hands and moved on.

0
5

[–] 23794677? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I'm actually going to enjoy reading these briefs. Seeing accomplished lawyers stain their own reputations with legal gymnastics will be satisfying. The Flynn case is so cut and dry, they can't possibly have any real legal reasoning.

0
1

[–] 23796713? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Judge Sullivan Makes Unusual Political Move – Delays End to General Flynn Case!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/05/judge-sullivan-makes-unusual-political-move-delay-justice-general-flynn/

Judge Sullivan – Who Previously Accused Gen. Flynn of Treason – Orders Prosecution to File Response to Gen. Flynn’s Motion to Dismiss by Monday May 4

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/04/judge-sullivan-previously-accused-gen-flynn-treason-will-file-response-flynns-motion-monday-may-4/

0
0

[–] 23795414? ago 

Judging done in facts not opinion

2
-2

[–] 23795239? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

What a waste of time