Posted by: 3788778?
Posting time: 8 months ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 7/26/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 149
SCP: 7
7 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 23569877? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Good choice.
Maybe he could also link this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSDqBVVFfsM
[–] 23572549? ago
^^debunked^^ See Qmap 9/9/18 posts 2122-2126. Neon Revolt did a good job calling out microchip: www.neonrevolt.com/2018/09/10/breaking-microchip-and-the-deep-state-newq-qanon-greatawakening-neonrevolt/
perhaps you've not been following Q from the beginning and don't know this "controversy" with Posobeek had been hashed out 2 years ago. (or perhaps you're a shill here to sow confusion). but if you're not doing any of your own research, one only needs to listen to the specifically curated 'facts' (Q followers are terror threats) and inconsistencies in the posobeek-microchip "interview" to know Posobeek is a limited hangout.
they cite "Hillary will be arrested" as Q's "first post". these posts were never identified with Q's tripcode. if you're going to pull in posts that "probably" are Q, then why not also include the ones from "John" who warned of the Las Vegas FF on 4ch not long before it happened? they fail to explain all the coordinated POTUS tweets-Q drops. and because they offer no additional "proof" microchip is Q other than the photoshopped chat logs, they claim 'somebody else' took it over. it's a very shallow hit piece.