The Democratic line-up for starters. They offered every flavor imaginable: a homo CIA operative, a bald negro, a chink promising a thousand bucks a month for everyone, a shady Cuban who was a member of Obama's cabinet, a skateboard-riding kid with JFK teeth, a fake-Indian moonbat, a Hindu female combat-vet, a billionaire midget, a whacked-out female who believes in mysticism, and a half-Jamaican MILF who fucked her way to the top...all they needed was a one-legged Muslim lesbian or a blind transgender-albino to complete the bizarre ensemble.
https://files.catbox.moe/4bp6n9.jpg
In the end, after the all hoopla and the open buffet of cleverly-crafted candidates, they ended up with two old white men. One with dementia, the other a socialist Jew.
https://files.catbox.moe/fnrdai.jpg
And now it looks like the DNC will screw Bernie again...how the fuck did Biden win so many states on Super Tuesday, states he never even campaigned in? Who the FUCK is even voting for a man who gets his fucking wife and sister mixed up, and calls Super Tuesday, Super Thursday?
https://files.catbox.moe/elrjlz.jpg
Sorta sounds like the DNC already had it planned to give the nomination to Biden, and we've been watching a pre-scripted reality show for the past year...like a huge version of Lizard Towing or Pawn Stars.
https://files.catbox.moe/2tcz0p.jpg
The idea maybe? The Obama/Clinton crime duo want to get Joe in as a puppet. They would pull the stings on "Joenocio", making the babbling fool sing and dance for the audience while they quietly dismantle everything Trump has accomplished, and complete their plan to turn America into a socialist, open-border, anti-gun, LGTBQXYX-friendly, 48 genders with 12 year old transgendered kids, black-reparation-gimmees, Green New Deal, late-term abortion, anti-Christian disaster.
https://files.catbox.moe/niwk37.jpg
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 22769357? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
?
If the evidence is to used as leverage/Whitemail material or to be brought into play later, they had to let the house flip.
The Dims used it for their peachmints, what was there goal from day1.
We simply can't know the plan. But i'm certain there will be no voter fraud in November. To much is at stake.
[–] 22769403? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
Let me put it this way. If someone is cheating at a casino, the casino doesn’t have to “let them win” to prove they were cheating. The cheating alone is the evidence that proves the crime.
[–] 22769512? ago
Sure, but then you have to "make it Public" - and maybe you Chose that it's Not the right time for that.
[–] 22769390? 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
No they wouldn’t. That makes zero logical sense. I don’t know how to make it any more simple. If fraud occurred, the evidence wouldn’t be dependent on “letting them flip the house”. The same evidence would exists regardless of the outcome. You aren’t thinking logically. At all.
Again what’s your basis to believe that? You haven’t presented any logical process to any of your comments. Faith? If it’s blind faith just say it. At least you’re being honest. But it’s not logic you’re using.
[–] 22769479? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I agree. That's exactly what I've thought all along, since Q stated "The Senate was the key".
[–] 22769464? ago (edited ago)
Example: When i witness you stealing in a mall, i can 'report' you on the spot. So you have to give your 'prey' back to the Store and face the consequences.
If i decide to use it to 'blackmail' you (LATER), i'd just videotape you in the act.
In this scenario, you will walk Home with your 'prey' and without facing consequences. Just until i knock on your door and show you my little videotape.
See what i mean? It's not unlogical.
Your other question, about November: 2016 is evidence that there are measures to effectively stop election rigging, as there were attempts. Otherwise, Hillary would be in the WH right now