Posted by: 3675799?
Posting time: 10 months ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 5/26/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 124
SCP: 97
98 upvotes, 1 downvotes (99% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 22659151? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Really wish HUD would begin building data sets as it relates to anchor babies on HUD Housing Programs.
All anchor-babies on HUD Housing programs are classified as American Citizens, the figures delivered by HUD do not provide any information as it relates to expenditures procured for anchor babies.
You're going to get a lot of mute-talking points thrown at you with regards to what % of welfare recipients are American Citizens, people need to understand that nobody knows the ball-park cost illegals are to our welfare system. Once an anchor baby is born, all filings related to welfare received is going to be classified as a US Citizen being the recepient, these anchor babies tend to have entire families piggy-back on the welfare programs they qualify for.
[–] 22659541? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Do you mean "moot talking points"? Mute means dumb (unable to speak).
[–] 22659587? ago
Doesn't make a sound, holds no vibration, unnoticed.