Posted by: 3674079?
Posting time: 10 months ago on
Last edit time: 10 months ago on
Archived on: 5/25/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 95
SCP: -6
2 upvotes, 8 downvotes (20% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
Sort: Top
[–] 22642102? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
People can agree with the sentiment of the poster without reading THAT posted article. What is the issue?
[–] 22642115? [S] ago
You mean "read the thread?" So people upvote a unopened thread. This is a great example (if true) of being lazy. The twitter post the OP linked is incorrect. The thread plays that out. So if you read thread title, but not open it - then you have been given "fake news" and consumed it willfully.
[–] 22642496? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yes people upvote and downvote without reading the article. Nothing nefarious occuring. And yes it absolutely lazy.
[–] 22642744? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This is the reason why these idiots feel for Q's trap. They are wholly unable to think things through.
[–] 22642493? ago
I sometimes will up vote if I know what I think it's about but would rather jump to something else.
[–] 22643023? [S] ago (edited ago)
So fall for fake news and don't care. When 10 seconds later you could have read the story and how quickly it fell apart. Awful.
[–] 22643537? ago
I wasn't talking about your specific thread. I just meant I'll up vote threads without opening them if I'm confident I know the context.
[–] 22642965? [S] ago
Except the twitter article was 'fake news' at the worst. Since it painted a Dem in a bad light people up vote it. It is a completely WRONG story. He didn't commute any sentences. He delayed executions until after he was out of office. A huge difference.
[–] 22642114? ago
The analytics here are not correct. Add a zero or 2 to any number you see on here.
[–] [deleted] ago
[–] 22642065? [S] ago
You mean "read the thread?" So people upvote a unopened thread. This is a great example (if true) of being lazy. The twitter post the OP linked is incorrect. The thread plays that out. So if you read thread title, but not open it - then you have been given "fake news" and consumed it willfully.
[–] 22641829? ago
Where do you see the number of reads?
[–] 22641954? [S] ago
Right column TRAFFIC STATS : "Views" in purple usually