Q post 3858 lead off with a jpeg of the GA (great awakening). The body of the post is a litany of "What happens when the news is__?" After a reminder of the many ways that the DS wants us divided, Q concludes with "positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism," stating that failure to have sources of reliable information represents "A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC."
(That summary was meant to Remind you what #3858 is about. If you haven't read it yet, Click Here.)
I've been reading other anons' speculation over whose arrest could shock the rest of the normies wide awake. IMO, the fatal flaw with most guesses like Comey, Brennan, and other Obama-era officials is that the MSM already has their stockpiled scripts to Scream Outrage or to Dismiss the Charges Outright as being vengeful & retaliatory politics.
Given (a) the Danger of Fake News, and (b) the Gripes, but No Enforcement to date of the FCC Regulations concerning false information, I'm leaning more and more toward the idea that the first 'shocking' indictments and arrests will and must cripple the legacy media.
If I were Anderson Cooper, Rachael Maddow, (or any other high-profile Anti-Trumper hack,) I'd be considering an extended sabbatical in a country that does not have an extradition treaty with the US. Both of them are widely recognized public figures who have openly, repeatedly, and demonstrably reported falsehoods. Surely they'd attempt to fight back with Freedom of the Press, but there are criminal statutes about knowingly reporting false information that endanger the public peace, and if they wanted to claim that MSM arrests were "political" revenge, well, they have already dug their own political pits, and that would be open admission that their reporting was so over-the-top-political that 'revenge' is a plausible response.
Is Q telling us to anticipate arrests of Media Controllers and Public Figures in the MSM?
Sort: Top
[–] 22503484? 0 points 14 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago (edited ago)
This is a good point, and i don't necessarily disagree, but i do have to question if Maddow or Cooper are really going to shock people into awareness. Your logic is sound, but my gut is telling me much bigger than that. I think it also helps to remember how irrefutable the evidence against Brennan/Comey/Rice/Obama/whomever will be. Part of me is hoping that the first arrest is "One of our guys" in order to dispell any notions of retribution (Pence?).
[–] 22505144? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
U make sense. If an initial arrest is a dem even with irrefutable proof, they’ll still spin it or not report it (please see the Russian special council and the impeachment) in my opinion. Maybe it does have to be one of our guys, great point. Pence would make a ton of sense, especially with a General Micheal Flynn acquittal coming later this month. This would open the door to VP Mike Flynn. Say, have u seen a trump 2020 sign? I have seen a few and you know who’s name I haven’t seen on any one of them? Pence.
[–] 22514922? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I have noticed that, too.
[–] 22505361? ago
RetardedAnon here, what’s the deal with pence?
[–] 22515898? ago
Bush
[–] 22503427? 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
I do not know. I think the first arrest will have rock solid evidence of an attempt to assassinate POTUS and could very well be the "whistleblower"
[–] 22504802? 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
This would be a terrible idea and would further alienate those under the spell already, possibly alienate those on the fence.
What could every American get behind, what could shock them into questioning everything?
Pizzagate arrests. The thing that the media said over and over was fake and nobody can defend or spin. I’m praying for this.
[–] 22503933? 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Someone posted the other day that BUSH was the BEST to arrest first. Not only would the LEFT love it, it'd open their eyes to the FACT that Trump is NOT partisan. After that they could not claim he is being so. Dominoes after Bush, plus it get our foot into 9/11, bailouts, wars, etc.
[–] 22503901? 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I think it will be someone that the media is not ready to defend and someone the media would be fine talking negatively about. Pence would fit the profile, but I do not think it will be him. It will be someone we have not talked about, but once announced we say of course.
[–] 22515942? ago (edited ago)
I'm pretty sure whomever it is, they've been named here before.
I'd like to see Justice Roberts arrested.
[–] 22504651? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
The media as it is now, must be destroyed. It is an extension of if not outright controlled by the c_a. They absolutely must be exposed.
[–] 22503458? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Ok dont really care whos first....just get it started........
[–] 22504848? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
3717 - First indictment [unseal] will trigger mass pop awakening.
First arrest will verify action and confirm future direction.
They will fight but you are ready.
For the arrest / unsealing to lead to trigger mass awakening, imo, would need to be someone that people, regardless of politics, have strong feelings about.
Between the people in media, the coup plotters, and all, I suspect that there are still too strong of partisan emotions behind those people. The accusations would fly about political motivations, abuse of power and all.
There are so many possibilities that I couldn't make anything better than a guess, but Bush is high on the list.
Consider; he's republican, the left hates him, the right are supportive to ambivalent, something related to 9-11 would shake the population, would show that it's about targeting corruption over the party politics, and would demonstrate the direction to follow. That it's about rooting out evil, and not just 'politics'.
[–] 22505255? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
What you say about 9/11 made me think of Rudy Guiliani knowing where all the bodies are buried.