https://files.catbox.moe/rmnrw4.jpg
OK, lots of threads about Dershy joining the Trump legal team, and a lot of mixed opinion. Yeah, there's a Q drop from 2018 that foretells of this, and Dershowitz is one of the best at what he does, so maybe we should be happy that he's going to be defending Trump in this horse and pony show...but I still have serious concerns about this guy.
Virginia Roberts.
Of all the people she could have accused, she decided to take on one of the most powerful, brilliant, lawyers in the fucking world. I know, ya always go for the deep pockets, and Dershy's are plenty deep, but he's no one you want to face off in court with unless ya really have something on him. And remember, it's not entirely Robert's making the accusations, there's a team of sleazy lawyers guiding her every move, and I doubt they would have dared point a finger at Dershowitz unless there was something substantial to support the charges.
Just the fact that this guy was Epstein's attorney leaves a bad smell around him. That's the thing I truly despise about lawyers, they're fucking mercenaries who will defend the biggest scumbag on the face of the Earth if the money is right. You can literally walk into a lawyer's office with blood on your hands and hire him to prove your innocence in the murder you just committed, IF you have the money. Here's one good example...
https://files.catbox.moe/ov0kvj.jpg
So I have conflicting feelings on Dershy and Trump's decision to hire him. Maybe it's a good move on Trump's part, but I still think there are a LOT of nasty skeletons in Dershowitz's closet.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 22158760? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
He's a supersmart and ultrapersuasive bastard all right.
He had me completely fucking amazed in Bush vs Gore.
What Gore was demanding was so patently outrageous -- lose according to the established tabulating rules, get recount and lose, demand changes to how votes are counted and lose again, and still demand yet more recounts and selective ones at that, engineered to guaranteed increase his votes but not his opponent's* -- that I couldn't imagine anyone could seriously argue the merits of it. What, keep counting and change how you do it till you win via essentially selective stuffing of the ballot box, then the counts end? That's the only criterion for when the process stops?
But Dershowitz wrote astounding briefs, and wrote them fast. Amazingly persuasive. In truth completely wrong, but amazingly persuasive.