You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] 22141414? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

My thought was just that an assa551nation event, well documented, could trigger some high profile arrests early, which would totally wake the normies, without yet having to start the arrests for the 2016 coup attempt (or pedovore stuff).

0
0

[–] 22142392? ago 

I agree with that. The question is, since you and I both know of at least a few of these attempts, it seems whitehats would have done what u are saying but for some reason they have not.

My other point I wanted to ask u about was where u say that the events have to play out and again, this is something plausible indeed, however you then say this...

”unless through FISA he catches them in a coup plot, in which case we could start seeing arrests sooner”.

And I say that q has told us fisa works both ways since the first half of 2018 and would most likely have the goods on the coup attempt, so then why wouldn’t q team have started arresting sooner, as you say? Thanks for the conversation.

0
1

[–] 22142521? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I'm thinking they maybe had good enough cause to know those other attempts were in fact 'a' attempts, but that they didn't have enough trial-worthy evidence to undeniably lock it down. Increased FISA surveillance over time might have provided that. We also had to drain the swamp creatures (or put them in check) in the FISA courts. Unfortunately for me, that's the guesswork in which we have to trust the plan. I will trust the plan through Trump's second term but it has an expiration date because I don't see how we can trust anyone after him unless he drains the swamp before then. That said, we don't know what we'll be presented with over the next 4.5 years so I'm remaining open.