You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
-1

[–] 22121922? 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

Last time it was 3 mansions. Now it is 6 mansions. We're going to need a citation or I will say "fake news".

0
0

[–] 22125276? ago 

Found it> 3. Mansions in Vermont, DC, newest on Lake Champlain for $600,000 in 2016. Apparently his carbon footprint as an elite 1% is allowed to be much bigger than his voters. He doesn't have to share his wealth or wouldn't he have already put his money where his mouth is and spent all this money for the homeless? I believe he espouses a 70% tax rate for 1%-ers like himself. Why hasn't he led by example? Why haven't ANY of the 1% dem candidates donated 70% of their earned income to share their wealth, especially Bernie, Bloomberg, Steyer, & Pocahontas Warren?

0
0

[–] 22127348? ago  (edited ago)

Three homes, not 6?

I am aware that they owned two homes, then her parents died. (Not entirely sure, but it is common for Congressmen to have a house in DC and a house in their home state.) They sold the parents' house and one of their houses, and bought the house in 2016. Not sure if the current total is two or three. You can look at purchase records, but you really need to do current title searches in GIS. Homes can be sold without it showing up. If you use that metric, I would show up owning three homes on the record books.

The 2016 house was purported to be a "lakeside mansion" but I have seen a tour of it and it is more like a cabin. They wanted it fairly big because they have grandkids. It's not out of the question for someone to have a cabin. I have one myself, in addition to my home. Mine isn't on a lake, but I wanted something secluded in the woods.

0
0

[–] 22124687? ago 

3 really nice homes.