You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 22062149? ago 

I was thinking the same. I dug deeper into it, and it still doesn't make any sense.

He says his security computer company is looking into it. Then he says the Times is looking into it.

Doesn't make sense at all. So he's using his work computer to download child porn. If this is the case, then it's not his IP address because is work would all have the same IP.

Then theres the part where how would he know someone's using it, unless he was already accused of this. To be accused of this, they would be monitoring him for awhile. What else is he being accused of? I recken the money is he is making the child porn, or uploading them.

0
1

[–] 22063118? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

the times looking into it was speculated to mean that he is warning them to delete their stash