You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
1

[–] 21970465? [S] 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

“Knowing them” doesn’t mean congregating with them or immersing myself in their social situations, my god what a leap for someone who seems otherwise having at least, average intelligence. What I’m speaking of is as simple as being friends on Facebook and observing their posts or cashiers at regular stores I shop etc. The “butch” descriptor is possibly the best way to describe them without having to go through and describe the type of hair etc, kind of like how folks abbreviate initials and, for instance “lol” etc. Everyone seems to easily understand this particular “descriptor” without having the commenter have to type out a drug out explanation.

“and why your social choices confound you to the point of seeking explanations from strangers on the internet.”

So let’s get this straight. The internet is the sole reason, that many people have been able to wake up, so to speak. It’s been described as a “genie that escaped from the cabal bottle”. The most transformative tool for enlightenment for the masses. In fact right here, on voat are “research boards” where folks share information or ask questions about things that they don’t know quite fully about. And you’re degrading someone (in a very condescending way) for going on the internet and asking questions in order to better understand certain things? Why is it so odd to you that someone would go on the internet to search for knowledge? Very very low IQ.

2
-2

[–] 21971391? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

“Knowing them” doesn’t mean congregating with them or immersing myself in their social situations

Perhaps. But I presumed your claim to ”know” them included more interaction than simply noticing a haircut. Particularly considering your claimed knowledge of their political affiliation and commitment to the sjw agenda. My god, a person of average intelligence wouldn’t make a leap like that about someone without hanging out with them, right? Spending time with people and discussing political and social issues = ‘congregating’. Check for yourself.

BTW, I never suggested you immersed yourself in their social situation. Like all of us, you are immersed in your own social situation. Unlike most of us, your social situation includes a homogenous political and social bias held by ”every single female” sporting a particular hairstyle.

And you’re degrading someone (in a very condescending way) for going on the internet and asking questions in order to better understand certain things?

You asked a question. I took the time to compose a detailed response, augmented with my personal experiences, and posed two questions in return. I used full sentences, proper grammar, respectful word choices, and included no disparaging language or personal invective. Yet here you are, claiming special victim status, having suffered somehow as a result of some unspecified ”degrading” pronouncement from me. Hyper-sensitive, instinctive ‘victim’ claims are a strategic posture adopted by certain social groups when faced with a logical question regarding their paradigm. You seem to be offering a series of consistent ’tells’.

Why is it so odd to you that someone would go on the internet to search for knowledge?

It’s not. I do find it odd that some claiming to be seeking ‘knowledge’ react with surprising revulsion when knowledge is presented.

Very very low IQ.

Ad hominem noted. You have painted a very revealing self-portrait in a mere two posts.

0
0

[–] 21972639? ago 

and my fourth vote made your attack invisible, so there's that (am otheranon as well, but then i'm not purple so it's obvious)