You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
10

[–] 21954051? 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

A report from US Attorney John Durham never made any sense.

US Attorney's hold grand juries, then issue indictments when the juries agree that there is sufficient evidence of a crime. Arrests are made, trials are held and the guilty are sentenced. There is no report from a the US Attorney before or after grand juries. Grand Jury testimony is secret, therefore Durham is not in a position to legally release grand jury testimony.

Why would Durham be different?

0
2

[–] 21954522? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Hopefully he’s different than Huber LMAO