Posted by: 3587631?
Posting time: 12 months ago on
Last edit time: 12 months ago on
Archived on: 3/31/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 1418
SCP: 291
297 upvotes, 6 downvotes (98% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 21954051? 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
A report from US Attorney John Durham never made any sense.
US Attorney's hold grand juries, then issue indictments when the juries agree that there is sufficient evidence of a crime. Arrests are made, trials are held and the guilty are sentenced. There is no report from a the US Attorney before or after grand juries. Grand Jury testimony is secret, therefore Durham is not in a position to legally release grand jury testimony.
Why would Durham be different?
[–] 21954522? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Hopefully he’s different than Huber LMAO