NSFW Anon Archived It's fucking weird that the left hate the patriarchy... but don't realize that the patriarchy is Soros, Roths, and Saud (QRV)
submitted ago by 3580995?
Posted by: 3580995?
Posting time: 12 months ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 3/26/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 98
SCP: 48
49 upvotes, 1 downvotes (98% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
NSFW Anon Archived It's fucking weird that the left hate the patriarchy... but don't realize that the patriarchy is Soros, Roths, and Saud (QRV)
submitted ago by 3580995?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 21893899? 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
Point of contention acceptable.
Would argue that it's strongly implied though. We're at an impasse without clarification though I suppose.Actually, scratch that for just a moment, seems I misread at the start there. Hold on.
Ah yep, I see where I made a mistake. I should have instead said:
Good work on the quoting there, by the way.
[–] 21894087? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
It would, we agree.
[–] 21894186? 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
Not necessarily. The underlying point I was alluding to acts as the TL;DR. (Excuse the long sentence (shitty grammar) ahead)
If
OP, let's change it up slightly and go down the hypothetical route, a hypothetical right-winger who called the families/entity in question, "patriarchy", and our hypothetical leftist were to be specific in naming who they consider "patriarchy", chances are good that they'd both have so much overlap that all left/right lines would blur and they'd both finally realize that the same broader entity (by any name) is trying to pit them against one another.At most you could split hairs and say the term "patriarchy" is popularly a leftist soundbite.
[–] 21894058? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
You're referring to the formatting ?
[–] 21894072? 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
The use of "(...)" "... (<snipped text>) ...", loved it.