NSFW Anon Archived On the claim that the Senate, as the jury, cannot call witnesses... (QRV)
submitted ago by 3570780?
Posted by: 3570780?
Posting time: 1 year ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 3/19/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 49
SCP: 1
2 upvotes, 1 downvotes (67% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
NSFW Anon Archived On the claim that the Senate, as the jury, cannot call witnesses... (QRV)
submitted ago by 3570780?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 21797958? ago
The whistleblower (CIARAMELLA) would be a new witness, therefore not admissible by Chuckles. Vindman could be called.
However, IMO, Trump can call anyone if he's allowed the ability. I don't think McConnell nor Graham want any witnesses.
Chief Justice Roberts will make the legal decisions but even he can be overruled by 51 Senators. I think there are too many RINOs to accurately predict what's going to happen.
[–] 21798126? [S] ago
Here are the Senate's official rules for impeachment: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CDOC-99sdoc33/html/CDOC-99sdoc33.htm
Those rules emphatically falsify any claim that the Senate has no power to call witnesses that did not testify in the House impeachment hearings.
Key quote: "VI. The Senate shall have power to compel the attendance of witnesses, to enforce obedience to its orders, mandates, writs, precepts, and judgments..."
The Chief Justice can force the Senate to abide by its own rules, no matter how many Senators vote otherwise. That's his Constitutional job in the Senate trial. The Senate's only legally-valid recourse would be to sue to over-rule Roberts. Guess where that ends up?