What really chaps my backside with this clown is that so many people say his motivations and honesty can’t be questioned because he’s an active duty military officer. We can’t criticize actions to which he admitted in sworn testimony because he’s a combat veteran? My ass we can’t!! Not to put too fine a point on it, but I retired from the Army just about the same time this disgrace was getting his commission (early 1999).
By his own testimony, he advised his Ukrainian counterparts based on his own formulation of what he ‘thought’ U.S. foreign policy should be instead of what that policy actually was.
Parallel reporting has revealed that he was verbally reprimanded for bad mouthing America and Americans in conversations with Russian soldiers while participating in military exercises in Germany. This certainly calls into question his allegiance to the U.S..
Is there any reason to believe that this is the first and only time LTC Vindman attempted to influence U.S. foreign policy by injecting his personal views and opinions?
How is it possible that we have two Ukrainian-born U.S. Army officers (Alexander and his twin brother) simultaneously serving on the U.S. National Security Council at the same time a controversy erupts that just happens to involve Ukraine?
Who assigned LTC Vindman to the NSC in the first place? Is it normal for Infantry branch officers to be detailed to the NSC? Is it possible that someone intent on undermining this President and administration placed him there as a mole?
There are a lot of questions about LTC Vindman that deserve answers and he cannot be shielded just because he’s an active duty officer or combat veteran. LTG Flynn is a combat veteran and look what was done to him.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 21284923? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
A military officer who advises a foreign nation to ignore the wishes of the president? How many sections of the UCMJ does that violate? I mean the oath he took says he will uphold the orders of the president for christ sake.