You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
12

[–] 20600323? 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

That top comment about it being a technique to release a misleading story that gets lots of exposure and then "correct" it later, wherein the correction gets very little exposure, is bang on. They've done that tons in the last year or two and seem to be free to do so by saying it was in error.

0
1

[–] 20601395? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Reminds me of that "disruptive" business strategy that companies like Uber, AirBnB and Bird are using to roll out in cities without any permits: "Better to ask forgiveness than to ask for permission."

They're well aware of the fact that what they do operates outside of regulations. But they do it anyway for as long as they can until they're forced to make changes once people make a ruckus about their practices. These are all shady tactics.

I'm sure Jew York Times has adopted similar guidelines now that the jog is up WRT the fact that people know they're fake news and part of the DS.

0
0

[–] 20603668? ago  (edited ago)

Good post up until totally unnecessarily outs self as a "Jew hater". Is it impossible to just leave the "Jew" hating shit out, and simply make your point? Makes all the rest of it sound ignorant.