Posted by: 3392273?
Posting time: 1.3 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 11/19/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 47
SCP: 3
5 upvotes, 2 downvotes (71% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 20260410? ago
Raise just one legitimate point and please be realistic about the likelihood of your attempts at humor being successful.
I did not just say Q was wrong, I gave reasons why and explained why the Q obsession is harmful. That is a rational analysis and not just name calling. If I ever did feel the need to inject humor into my post it would be effective and not just moronic name calling.
[–] 20261269? [S] ago
We’ve been here since the beginning. We’ve seen a lot of stuff. And you saunter in here with your “rational analysis” against Q and say the “obsession” is harmful? Lol Your analysis is based on light Q reading and MSM articles. You don’t have anywhere near the same number of data points in context that we do.
You glow. And your efforts will bear no fruit. Why don’t you go to a Bernie Rally or something. They need ppl there.
[–] 20262045? ago
I was here from the beginning. Raise logical points and if you try to engage in a war of wits at least be funny.