You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 20260356? [S] ago 

Quid pro quo: it would then be equally legitimate to question your shilly ass too, no?

0
0

[–] 20260410? ago 

Raise just one legitimate point and please be realistic about the likelihood of your attempts at humor being successful.

I did not just say Q was wrong, I gave reasons why and explained why the Q obsession is harmful. That is a rational analysis and not just name calling. If I ever did feel the need to inject humor into my post it would be effective and not just moronic name calling.

0
0

[–] 20261269? [S] ago 

We’ve been here since the beginning. We’ve seen a lot of stuff. And you saunter in here with your “rational analysis” against Q and say the “obsession” is harmful? Lol Your analysis is based on light Q reading and MSM articles. You don’t have anywhere near the same number of data points in context that we do.

You glow. And your efforts will bear no fruit. Why don’t you go to a Bernie Rally or something. They need ppl there.