Posted by: 3392273?
Posting time: 1.3 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 11/19/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 47
SCP: 3
5 upvotes, 2 downvotes (71% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 20260229? ago
Skepticism isn't phony. Years into this and nothing. And Qanon keeps saying "scarumucci method" over and over again when its obvious that scaramucci was a mistake and accomplished nothing.
Recent posts are just cheerleading. Any inside info Q ever posted could be explained by email hacking. For example the avenatti cell phone photo.
It is legitimate to question the Qanon movement. Where is the wall? Where is anything we were promised? Qanon is making people think they don't need to change to get things done. Stay the same and the video of Hillary in a child dungeon fixes everything. It's an excuse for not changing.
[–] 20260356? [S] ago
Quid pro quo: it would then be equally legitimate to question your shilly ass too, no?
[–] 20260410? ago
Raise just one legitimate point and please be realistic about the likelihood of your attempts at humor being successful.
I did not just say Q was wrong, I gave reasons why and explained why the Q obsession is harmful. That is a rational analysis and not just name calling. If I ever did feel the need to inject humor into my post it would be effective and not just moronic name calling.