NSFW Anon Archived Graham: Would be 'stunning' if DOJ declined to prosecute Comey (youtu.be)
submitted ago by 3362506?
Posted by: 3362506?
Posting time: 1.3 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 10/31/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 129
SCP: 22
23 upvotes, 1 downvotes (96% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
NSFW Anon Archived Graham: Would be 'stunning' if DOJ declined to prosecute Comey (youtu.be)
submitted ago by 3362506?
Sort: Top
[–] 19980750? 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
I think he said if the charges are true then it’s stunning but that he would accept the judgment of Barr if he decided not to prosecute. He most likely already knew that Barr wouldn’t prosecute for this.
[–] [deleted] 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
[–] 19980134? [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Source?
[–] 19983865? ago
I dont know you and you dont know me, but I would say you know nothing about the Hill, or this case specifically.
[–] 19983201? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
What I understood Graham to mean was that as this is going to be the first big case against the Deep State then it should not be just tentative. Metaphorically, the first big case should be knocked clean out of the park and into the next state. if Barr has a case like that in the pipeline then that could be why he made the decision he did.
That will bring the public up to speed and will set a positive tone for any future prosecutions.
[–] 19980662? 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Q/POTUS/DOJ continues to be Lucy promising to hold the ball for Charlie Brown. We are Charlie Brown.
[–] 19980934? [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
So we shouldn't keep and open mind and instead become helpless crybabies in your image?
[–] 19985552? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Or we could resort to pulling gross fake mischaracterization out of our ass like you when we have nothing of value or intelligence to offer,
[–] 19980558? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
You guys missed it again. You missed the part when Hannity said the word "FIRST" watch it again. What was that about? These cases need to be done in a specific order.
[–] 19980186? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
https://invidio.us/watch?v=pd32gz-spRE :
This has been an automated message.
[–] 19980156? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Why? They never charge anyone high in government with anything.
[–] 19983375? ago
They need to start strong with slam dunk cases and build some momentum with the normies. I trust the plan but can we just get going with it already?