You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
6

[–] 19663217? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I called it (not here but elsewhere today.) Said that Trump would have already fired him if he didn't have a damn good reason for doing what he did, and very likely with gold-standard documentation. If anything Acosta was always a contingency in their back pocket for when Epstein finally went to trial. How better to get the MSM to cover who really was pulling the strings back then.

0
2

[–] 19663852? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I think Acosta was given his job with secret service protection because the info he has is the type that gets you killed, supposedly Epstein and others were threatening him and his family to get the deal he got.

0
5

[–] 19664899? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I think he was told to back off by intel services, not Epstein or his cohorts. There should be sufficient documentation of it. Remember, Mueller was in charge of the FBI at the time. Doj brings the actual charges, but if he was running a honeypot for the intel agencies, then they'd say he was cooperating with them, which they said was the reason for such reduced charges.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]