You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 19621669? ago 

did you read the link you fucking asshole. seriously...no class!

0
0

[–] 19623344? ago 

I'm not that person but I did read it and it's a whole lot of nothing.

It's someone on twitter speculating that there's a second defendant based on vague evidence.

Then it's a story about how the Clinton library refused to respond to "a request"....they don't say who made this "request" so it most likely was OANN themselves, and no shit the Clinton library is gonna refuse their requests for info.

0
0

[–] 19625783? ago 

well im glad you read it, but why make an inflammatory comment when I was merely pointing out that another story was basically confirming it. Were all in the dark here after all.