Posted by: 3321532?
Posting time: 1.4 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 10/7/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 2980
SCP: 32
46 upvotes, 14 downvotes (77% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 19618487? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Ummm. This was pretty fucking specific. High prrifile arrest since Epstein. Big enough to VINDICATE q. Pretty specific. Nobody is gonna give a shit if juicy smellit is rearrested at this point. But if it was a clinton or a bush, now thats vindication. Thats pretty fuckin specific.
[–] 19620962? ago
It's the opposite of specific.There's already public speculation about several people close to Epstein. A rich and powerful guy get arrested for sex trafficking no shot other rich and powerful guys might get popped too.
[–] 19628693? ago
Yes, but if you have inside information that you are worried will be traced back to someone and place them in danger, what do you do?
Your source is going to see you blabbed, amd not trust you again out of fear, and you did no real service to anyone because you shared no real information.