You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
18

[–] 19617671? 2 points 18 points (+20|-2) ago 

Fake and gay.

Only reason to post predictions like this is to disappoint people and make them frustrated.

If it is really happening why the fuck are you tweeting this useless garbage?

0
3

[–] 19618104? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

here's the deal. 40Head is legit. He's been in front of a few major things recently; however, what is annoying is when those who might be in-the-know begin using things like "operational safety" as if they are part of the team. When these guys start grouping themselves into the Q Team, they just come off as wanna-bes. I believe 40Head knows. I don't believe "operational security" is part of his call.

0
4

[–] 19618419? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

  • Have source

  • They tell you information

  • If you leak that specific information, it will clearly be a breach of secrecy requirements for whoever your source works for, or for whoever gave your source that information

  • If you leak it, they will suddenly get in trouble. You may lose your source, they may lose their job (if they're lucky). AAAnd it distracts people doing an important job by having to play hunt the mole rather than do their work

  • If you merely give vague hints which let others know the gist, but do not break operational secrecy of your sources organisation, there is no real harm done, and as such no need for any of the stuff mentioned above to happen

Ta-da. operational safety in a nutshell. I doubt he's saying it because he actually feels in personal threat. But don't underestimate how easily his sources could get fucked if he leaked information they gave him.

source : I know a fair few intel twitter people, albeit from the more general geopolitics side of things

0
0

[–] 19619614? ago 

Yep.

It's like date fagging. Simply trying to sow discord. Trying to take away the Epstein attest morale boost.