if you are against pedophilia, you should support age of consent of 12 years old.
that's the medical definition of real pedophilia, it's sexual attraction to children before puberty. 12 year old girls are during or after puberty, they have period, pubic hair, growing breasts, so they are not children. you cannot change medical definition of pedophilia.
if you support age of consent like 16-20, then you are bluepilled SJW cuck, that works against interests of men, but for interest of old feminist women. it's old women who benefit from high age of consent, because they simply cannot compete with young, fresh, virgin girls. raising age of consent is the first thing women do when they get voting rights.
high age of consent has another society destroying effect - young girls, instead of being raised by their husband, grown man, are raised by jewish propaganda, feminism, jewish soap operas, their brains and minds are simply destroyed. such women are later useless as a wife and women.
that's why SJW are strongly against lower age of consent and support raising age of consent.
if you support age of consent above 12, they you are bluepilled cuck that strengthens jews, SJW, society destruction. you are so brainwashed by them that you even fail to realize this. most QRV niggers are in fact bluepilled, they are in false sense of being redpilled.
high age of consent and women (((education))) are major reasons of low fertility rate and suicide of white race. if you support it, then you support jews and white suicide
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 19537388? ago
Haven't we talked before? Girls who reach puberty should marry and have children, with parent's consent, nothing pedo about that, that's all I'm saying.
Whether that be twelve (unwise tho that age) or 17 or 18. It's been that way forever, till we got brainwashed.
[–] 19537453? ago
well I would recommend framing it differently for a more sympathetic reaction from readers. There is a big difference between saying "adult men should be able to have sex with 12 year olds" and "parents should be allowed to marry off their daughters at age 17 or 18". The age of consent is already 18, so 17-18 is not really much different. And I think a lot of states allow marriages for under 18 with consent of the parents. So just FYI, leading with "age of consent should be 12" will get a lot of people thinking "yeah, this guy just wants to fuck kids".
[–] 19537524? ago
You're right, the OP should def have phrased it better.