NSFW Anon Archived Is everyone still trusting Sessions, Wray and Huber? How about all those secret sealed indictments? (QRV)
submitted ago by 3255477?
Posted by: 3255477?
Posting time: 1.5 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 9/1/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 165
SCP: -3
5 upvotes, 8 downvotes (38% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
NSFW Anon Archived Is everyone still trusting Sessions, Wray and Huber? How about all those secret sealed indictments? (QRV)
submitted ago by 3255477?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 18971236? ago
I honestly can't speak to the validity of the claim, either way, so take it with a grain of salt. It did make sense to me, though.
I remember reading a thread a few months ago (wish I could tell you exactly where, maybe abovesecret.com) in which there was a pretty good discussion about the whole "sealed indictments" topic.
Acording to a couple of the posters, who both were much more knowledgable of that particular database than I am, those numbers represent proceedings.
That said, if I understand correctly, you could actually end up having more than one indictment per proceeding but any given proceeding could also have zero indictments. Also, can't say I was ever able to determine if the total number is an anomaly, as far as sealed proceedings go.
So, if true, not really a "debunking", necessarily. Just a little shift in understanding of the data we're looking at.
If it is, in fact, accurate, I think it needs to be understood and spread so we aren't misstating facts.