NSFW Anon Archived Is everyone still trusting Sessions, Wray and Huber? How about all those secret sealed indictments? (QRV)
submitted ago by 3255477?
Posted by: 3255477?
Posting time: 1.5 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 9/1/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 165
SCP: -3
5 upvotes, 8 downvotes (38% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
NSFW Anon Archived Is everyone still trusting Sessions, Wray and Huber? How about all those secret sealed indictments? (QRV)
submitted ago by 3255477?
Sort: Top
[–] 18969629? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I’m busy watching the water!
[–] 18968066? 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Yes. Mid-terms are safe. TRUST THE PLAN
[–] 18967794? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Sessions is very deep state, i'd be SHOCKED if he turns out legit.
[–] 18967442? 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
[–] 18967643? ago
if they weren't we would have lost the Senate
[–] 18967369? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
It's my understanding those are sealed proceedings, not indictments.
And yeah, I still trust Sessions and Huber until I see information that would make me think otherwise.
For me, the jury's still out on Wray; leaning towards not trusting him afte he apparently withheld relevant info.
[–] 18967665? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I enjoy reading comments of educated Q followers!
thanks for replying!
[–] 18967638? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Sealed proceedings - care to enlighten us more? First time I've heard it called that, what's the differences?
[–] 18971236? ago
I honestly can't speak to the validity of the claim, either way, so take it with a grain of salt. It did make sense to me, though.
I remember reading a thread a few months ago (wish I could tell you exactly where, maybe abovesecret.com) in which there was a pretty good discussion about the whole "sealed indictments" topic.
Acording to a couple of the posters, who both were much more knowledgable of that particular database than I am, those numbers represent proceedings.
That said, if I understand correctly, you could actually end up having more than one indictment per proceeding but any given proceeding could also have zero indictments. Also, can't say I was ever able to determine if the total number is an anomaly, as far as sealed proceedings go.
So, if true, not really a "debunking", necessarily. Just a little shift in understanding of the data we're looking at.
If it is, in fact, accurate, I think it needs to be understood and spread so we aren't misstating facts.
[–] 18968951? ago
Of course. Progress has been made.
[–] 18967953? 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
As long as the "Players" link on Qmap continue to show them as "Patriots" then yes, I trust them.
[–] 18967652? ago
Sessions = ??, Huber = ??, Wray = Wrat!!