Posted by: 3244440?
Posting time: 1.5 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 8/26/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 658
SCP: 8
8 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 18853755? ago
I reckon the best way to combat the DeepFake defense in court would be to have corroborating evidence. This could be a witness, some documents, whatever.
Knowing this, my opinion on the DeepFake narrative is that it is primarily designed to persuade the public via the Fake News. I don't think that it will persuade a jury when sufficient corroborating evidence exists.
[–] 18854695? ago
Video/audio recordings should NEVER be sufficient for a conviction. Now, as I’ve said, if MI has the actual evidence and can’t convict, I’m fine with some judge dredd action.