You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 18853755? ago 

I reckon the best way to combat the DeepFake defense in court would be to have corroborating evidence. This could be a witness, some documents, whatever.

Knowing this, my opinion on the DeepFake narrative is that it is primarily designed to persuade the public via the Fake News. I don't think that it will persuade a jury when sufficient corroborating evidence exists.

0
0

[–] 18854695? ago 

Video/audio recordings should NEVER be sufficient for a conviction. Now, as I’ve said, if MI has the actual evidence and can’t convict, I’m fine with some judge dredd action.