Posted by: 3215827?
Posting time: 1.6 years ago on
Last edit time: 1.6 years ago on
Archived on: 8/12/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 2162
SCP: 94
94 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
Sort: Top
[–] 18578369? 0 points 26 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago (edited ago)
When they first came up with the FISA, we libertarians said HELL NO! There is too much possibility of abuse toward regular citizens. Too much possibility of weaponizing the powers of the intelligence services for political reasons, and that is exactly what has happened. Now, either you are going to prosecute those guilt of this abuse, or we will get FISA repealed.
[–] 18578718? 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
I’ve done a lot of thinking on this exact thing and I do agree that as a libertarianish type I was, too, screaming bad idea. It’s impossible to have a cookie jar and keep all bad hands out of it. The rubber stamp was virtually assured when we look at the bullshit going through the 9th circuit tour de corrupcíon heh.
Now that said - what if FISA from the start was set up as a trap of sorts KNOWING the Cabal wouldn’t be able to stay away?
From all of Q what I have gathered is CIA / DIA have always had keys to surveillance. When Echelon rolled out and NSA rapidly obtained backdoors to the Internet backbones themselves and cryptographic deciphering at the quantum level the Cabal had to be shitting their pants. Finally the scope of the legit white hat paradigm overshadowed them and Dark would Come to Light and they had no choice but to make a play to level the NSA.
And here we are.
[–] 18579211? ago
The Church Committee
[–] 18578515? 0 points 11 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago
So either Q gave disinformation regarding trust Wray...... or Trump is making Wray look like a bad guy (one of them) before indictments are handed down.
[–] 18579227? 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Wrays interests lie with protecting the reputation of the Bureau
[–] 18581171? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
No reason to protect the reputation of the Bureau insofar as it is undeserved and needs major reform -- unless you, too, need your prior deeds obscured.
[–] 18578729? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
He did the same w Sessions. Called Sessions Mr MaGoo etc
[–] 18581176? ago
Sessions is a Mr. Magoo.
[–] 18582142? 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Or Q is full of shit.
[–] 18581725? ago
Ok i'm going to 'use logic'. If Wray is deep state, the deep state knows that. If he's not, the deep state knows that, they know their own people. So 'Trust Wray' could only possibly be disinfo for anons, and if that's the case, what's the point in saying it at all?
[–] 18583583? ago
To protect sessions / wray etc. If you are the cabal, and you know your guys but are unsure of the others, and trump bad mouths an unknown , you let your guard down a bit because you feel they aren't in trumps camp.
[–] 18578575? 1 point 8 points 9 points (+9|-1) ago
The same way he attacked Sessions. To get the Dems to defend Wray! The Boom!!!
[–] [deleted] 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
[–] 18598185? ago
Well said, thank you anon.
[–] 18578517? 2 points 4 points 6 points (+6|-2) ago
Wray is, and has always been, a WRINO WRAT.
[–] 18579044? 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
Who remembers Fay Wray ?
[–] 18578700? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
All I know is it is a show and things keep happening to make Dems and man say what needs to be said to draw the sleeping public right where their eyes need to be to witness the next exposing thing . Wether they are superbly manipulated or the Patriots are " in control " it is like watching a bunch of freaked out turkeys cross the road . .. are they really crossing or just freaking out with no objective but to freak out. They just standing in the middle of the road losing their minds.
[–] 18580963? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
You nailed it.
[–] 18578998? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Wray is acting. Trump is acting. Dems are too stupid to figure it out. Trust the Plan.
[–] 18579011? [S] ago
A possibility. But why did he deliberately keep damning evidence from Congressional investigators who are legally allowed to have it?
[–] 18579440? ago
It sure has gotten a lot of attention. What it he redacted it, then leaked that it was redacted? Just one possibility.
[–] 18578472? 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago (edited ago)
POTUS IS TALKING ABOUT COMEY AND DISTANCING HIMSELF FROM THE FBI IN WHAT IS ABOUT TO HAPPEN, OP.
"The Director is protecting the same gang.....that tried to....overthrow the President through an illegal coup."
That "gang" HAVE ALREADY ALL BEEN FIRED, BY JEFF SESSIONS.
Wray can't logically 'protect' former FBI employees...or DIRECTORS the way Comey protected the plotters of the illegal coup
It is logically impossible for "The Director" to be referring to the present tense, from POTUS' perspective.
POTUS is using a quote from JW to 'in code' via "The Director" to target Comey AND at the same time be 'frustrated' at the FBI today.
JW is just saying Wray won't disclose FBI materials on the plotters.
Of course he won't, such materials are evidence before grand juries.
The way JW characterizes it, is not the correct reading of current events. JW is speaking from a FOIA perspective.
Wray CANNOT GIVE JW evidence when it is....PART OF ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS, e.g. 6(E) GRAND JURY MATERIAL.
Did the light click on?
"Act weak when you are a strong and strong when you are weak" - Sun Tzu
BARR OVERSEES WRAY.
"TRUST WRAY" - Q
[–] 18579966? 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
This has a ring of truth to me!
[–] 18587196? ago
That's why the shills are downvoating you!
[–] 18604511? ago
Correct.
[–] 18578498? [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
NO.
[–] 18587457? 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
YES.