You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
2

[–] 18537486? 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I don't understand how this is proof.

By the time of the Q post Rod Rosenstein's job was in doubt. It was all over the news. In fact, in looking up this comment, I came across this in on of the articles "If Rosenstein is dismissed—this week or next, this month or in six months—it would surprise only those who choose to be surprised."

Rosenstein was on the chopping block Let's look at the timeline. All of these news stories appear a full month before the Q post

April 10 CNN Trump considering firing Rosenstein to check Mueller

April 12 Politico Trump meeting stokes fears he may oust Rosenstein

April 13 NBC Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein tells confidants he is prepared to be fired

In the DOJ 3 replaces 2.

The DOJ has a line of succession and this widely known. In fact one of the first Trump executive orders set the line of succession at the DOJ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13775

and this was discussed a month before the Q post. Here's an article in Politico April 13 What happens if Trump fires Rosenstein

The first person up would be the Justice Department’s No. 3 official, the associate attorney general.

O’Callaghan was number 3. April 3rd https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/deputy-attorney-general-rod-rosenstein-announces-edward-o-callaghan-acting-principal

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein today announced that Edward O’Callaghan will serve as the Acting Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General.

So lots and lots of people thought Rod Rosenstein might be fired in the spring of 2018 and Edward O’Callaghan was next in the line of succession.

This seem close to conventional wisdom, rather than some proof. It was definitely widely discussed in the press Especially when Rosenstein stayed on the job until Mueller issued his report.

0
2

[–] 18541683? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

You linked to the DOJ line of succession, which has the associate attorney general as #3. When I search that position, it’s Jesse Panuccio, not Ed. From Feb 2018, so he also would’ve been at the time of the Q post. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Panuccio

Also the fact that Whitaker was appointed to acting AG, which we know was outside of the line of succession because Dems were screaming about it, definitely makes this a Q proof. It appears they don’t have to follow the succession

2
-2

[–] 18539982? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

It isn’t proof. (These are Qlowns.)