You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
3

[–] 18325722? 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

Jackson developed a reputation as one of the best writers on the Supreme Court and one of the most committed to enforcing due process as protection from overreaching federal agencies.

How fitting is RR's reference to this particular Justice. What color is his hat?

0
5

[–] 18327294? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yet Jackson at Nuremburg oversaw a process that would give kangaroo courts a bad name:

1) Confessions obtained by torture

2) Documents the veracity of which were never proven: the classic example is the so-called "Hossbach Memorandum". Hossbach himself declared at Nuremburg that he could not verify the veracity of the memo while even A.J.P. Taylor has conceded that what is discussed in the memo did not provide any evidence for the charges that were made based upon it.

Yet Jackson nevertheless admitted it as evidence of a conspiracy to go to war!!!

3) Accepting obvious perjuries

4) Refusal to allow cross examination of witnesses

5) Refusal to allow the quo que defense - that is, the defense was not permitted to make reference to any of the endless number of horrific war crimes carried out by the Allies under direct instruction of the Allied leadership - for example the Firestorm murder of millions of German civilians by Bomber Command or Beria's exhortation to Soviet soldiers that as they entered Germany they must "Rape, and rape, and rape again!"

Jackson was a tool of Jewish and Bolshevik hatred for Whites and for Christian and European culture

0
3

[–] 18327350? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Came here to that one would argue the Nuremberg trails were a farce, but this sums it up pretty well.

4
-4

[–] 18327517? 4 points -4 points (+0|-4) ago 

Well, at least they all deserved what they got. A trial wasn't really necessary.