You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] 18276820? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Seems like good advice.Why call OP a schill? Are you arguing that DOJ site is fake/disinfo? I mean if the DOJ was after me , I would crap.We could argue competence ,corruption all day long and I would agree it has both, but once they cuff you you're done.Not subjective. Maybe I'm missing the punch line.

0
4

[–] 18277246? [S] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Basically these people always want you to have it that their YouTube or website source is absolutely to be believed, even when the only evidence that source cites contradicts their claim. Or even if there is no evidence at all. Maybe just sleight of hand or pure made-up assertions.

In some cases people post this honestly: they themselves have been deceived. You can tell when this is the case because when true and backed-up information is given they are glad to have it.

In other cases, it's about impossible to believe they don't know it's a lie and they chose to post exactly because it is a lie or severely distorted. Especially when they do it again and again and again.

0
2

[–] 18277465? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Agreed, Some times I fall through the cracks with the weak attempts a humor, personally I think facts continuously get stronger as snippets of info are dug out.Lies,well they generally start contradicting themselves by morphing into something else. Intuitive ,sure, but it works for me. I have been doing alt research prior to the Interweb so,I have heard every BS that you can imagine.T/Q for reply