You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] 17931871? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

We have it all we don't need her evidence, no?

0
0

[–] 17932968? ago 

I never interpreted that as a blanket statement across all federal criminal cases being prosecuted. Am sure most are going to have to be pursued through very much the traditional means - this is not in a military tribunal setting, after all

0
0

[–] 17938427? [S] ago 

Well Q talked about Mack so 1 could assume "no deals" would apply!