You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

4
-4

[–] 17761266? [S] 4 points -4 points (+0|-4) ago 

The text was in its entirety. If you don't want people to see it, that's on you.

0
6

[–] 17761394? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

But where did you get the text from? Is it online somewhere? Because anyone could type that up and post it, referring to the source corroborates the text

0
0

[–] 17764420? [S] ago 

It was originally an email from a reputable source. It is now on the organization's official website. The OP has been edited to add a link to it.

0
0

[–] 17762417? ago 

At best it's sketchy, at worst it's plagiarism. In an era of disinfo / fake news / mainstream news networks going Pravda (by the way, also April Fools day) this expectation should always be met when submitting a post about a newsworthy event. It's not asking much. Nobody should have to put in work to trace/guess where an OP might have originally copied the content from.

0
0

[–] 17764393? [S] ago 

It was originally an email. I was not aware it was on the website when I posted it. As I trusted the source, I thought people would want to know.

0
0

[–] 17762688? ago 

You're asking for a source and then calling plagiarism? That, seems, retarded...